“you’re letting the terrorists win!”

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

i live in my friend B’s basement. it’s not as weird as it sounds; he’s about a decade older than me, i’ve known him for ten or so years, and the basement’s actually furnished into a complete apartment- bedroom, kitchen w/stove, sink, etc., bathroom, living room, etc. and i pay him rent so i’m definitely not mooching.

occasionally we’ll talk about politics. well, he’ll talk about them. i prefer not to because it usually only ends in argument or judgment, etc. because people seem to think that your character should be entirely based upon your ideas of political guidance and so forth.

well, over the past two days it really hit the fan.

a bit of background. i’m a bit closer to the “liberal” political spectrum (i’m a pacifist, i support civil rights and liberties, etc.) and he’s a bit more republican (extremist conservative, in some cases). so we don’t always agree (that’s not even the issue; i don’t care if we disagree. he does).

conversation (paraphrased, because my memory is horrible) goes as follows:

B: so you think that war is wrong?

me: this war? yes. absolutely.

(we talk some more about it, etc.)

B: so i’ve got a question for you, then.

me: shoot.

B: if you had the chance to “take out” (his actual words. it’s murder, B. not “killing”- murder) someone you know was going to kill a million people, would you do it?

me: (long story short, i say no. summation: it’s impossible to know for sure that he would do such a thing. military intelligence is able to lie and be manipulated, and i am not able to know the heart of another human so it’s not my right to place judgment. more on this at the end)

B: really? what about when you stand in front of G-d and He asks you, “why did you let those people die?”

me: i’m not worried. i didn’t “let them die;” i never killed them. i’m not responsible for them. also, G-d knows my heart, He knows i didn’t want them to die.

B: i’m sorry, that’s just immoral, and evil, etc. and-

me: yeah. okay, goodnight.

i had to just walk away. because he wasn’t going to listen. he wanted me to agree with him; he was trying to trap me in some logic snare. but that’s the thing- it’s true. G-d doesn’t care about what we do, He cares about why we do them. i know you can turn this into a case of support for capital punishment and so forth, but there are problems with doing that (in the case of capital punishment, for instance, it’s got a commandment against it… not to mention Christ preached on pacifism and loving thy neighbour. and throwing someone in a chair and electrocuting them is not loving them, no matter how you spin it).

so then today, he apologizes for calling me immoral because he knows i’m loving.

but he dives right back into it. he can’t just let it drop.

B: i’d save your life, man. if i had to kill someone to save your life, i’d do it.

me: i’d save your life, too, but…

B: but? would you kill someone to save me? would you kill someone to save K (his 2?yr old daughter)?

me: you can’t put it like that. the chances of that happening are not existent. it’s not gonna come down to me mono-a-mono some axe-wielding maniac.

B: but you wouldn’t take him out?

me: no, i wouldn’t. because you don’t need to kill someone to incapacitate someone. i’m all for restraining him, but i wouldn’t kill the guy.

B: you would let my daughter get hacked up by some maniac?

me: no. i wouldn’t hand K to the guy and be like, “here! whack away!”

B: wow. man, i thought you were better than that.

(see? not listening to what i say.)

i kept trying to tell him maybe this p.o.v. will change when I’M a father, maybe it won’t. he just can’t respect that other people have different valid opinions, i think. also, i think he’s slightly racist, or biased, or something. there’s some underlying hate issues here that he’s not really acknowledging; he’s making and taking it all too personal.

i just hope he doesn’t get possessed. “no guys, it’s totally okay! you can take him out with a clean headshot, don’t even bother with an exorcism! let’s solve our problems by murder!” no. sorry.

he called me idealistic and naive.

WHAT IS FUCKING WRONG WITH THAT? why should i give into what the world wants me to feel, to think? why should i compromise what’s been laid on my heart, why should i deny others love, simply because other people are doing so? that’s motherfucking stupid. i’m sorry, the thought that i need to start giving in to some bullshit political system and some false indoctrinated religion and some fucked-up sense of selfishness just makes me angry. (you’re right, B. i’m pretty sure you aren’t reading, but i WAS getting mad. i wasn’t there yet, but that is why i left. you need to LISTEN. conversation is a two-way street, and your turning a discussion into an argument because i disagree is really unnecessary.)

Christ could have murdered the man that Legion possessed. but He didn’t. He had mercy and tried to (and did) REMEDY THE PROBLEM, not take the “easy” way out.

i just think his faith is weak and he’s cynical (funny, usually i seem to be the cynic because in a prev. discussion we had, i don’t trust people as easily. i still think you shouldn’t trust everyone completely right off the bat; that’s not trust). i can understand that, he’s been through a lot.

but he places too much focus on his family. i think he makes his family an idol.

“what? such heresy, brent!” you might say. no, it’s true!

B brings up the OT (that’s Old Testament for you non-xians) an awful lot as support for “killing” (murdering) others. but conveniently, he does not reconcile the story of Abraham and Isaac- when a boy’s OWN FATHER is commanded to murder his son as a sacrifice (it wouldn’t really be a sacrifice if it wasn’t murder, technically; all sacrifices need suffering. that’s why we call things sacrifices today- they cause us to suffer for a greater good).

and i don’t just have the OT on my side on this one. he also forgets the New Testament’s Luke 14:26-33(NIV) (emphasis added)! these are the words of Christ!

26“If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters—yes, even his own life—he cannot be my disciple. 27And anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.

28“Suppose one of you wants to build a tower. Will he not first sit down and estimate the cost to see if he has enough money to complete it? 29For if he lays the foundation and is not able to finish it, everyone who sees it will ridicule him, 30saying, ‘This fellow began to build and was not able to finish.’

31“Or suppose a king is about to go to war against another king. Will he not first sit down and consider whether he is able with ten thousand men to oppose the one coming against him with twenty thousand? 32If he is not able, he will send a delegation while the other is still a long way off and will ask for terms of peace. 33In the same way, any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple.

WOW! that’s pretty powerful stuff! we should never abandon G-d’s encouragement of purity and Christ’s teachings of love, not even for vengeance (for what IS our own sense of “justice”? it’s pretty fucked up; we, as human beings, are very imperfect so we cannot ever rely on our internal sense of “humane-ness” or what’s important to us- we need to rely on what Christ has shown us).

(note: i’d love any and all of you to leave feedback. even if you disagree with me; that’s okay! i’m curious to hear what you think/feel and why you do, whether you agree with me or not! leave a comment!)

4 Responses to ““you’re letting the terrorists win!””

  1. GurgieTrueshot Says:

    It’s really tough when dealing with someone who is just trying to get you to agree with them. First I would suggest reading John Howard Yoder’s “What would you do?” Great book that has a lot of situations like yours. Maybe even get him to read it. It is a short quick read.

    John Howard Yoder is a religion prof at Notre Dame. Really good author if you don’t know him.

    You mentioned something about our outlook changing when you become a father. I was in a class studying Deuteronomy right after I became a father. A lot of theses questions came up especially because many of the students were not pacifists and didn’t even know what a pacifist was. Since I had to explain my self quite a bit it really got me thinking about what would I do in that sort of situation. Honestly I don’t know. I have no doubt that I would at some point resort to physical force to protect my family however killing is another question. I have to take into consideration my families wishes. Would my wife want me to kill someone else? Even if it meant saving her? That is something that needs to be taken into consideration. Along with the fact that you even have the ability to kill the other person. At 6 foot and 125lbs I’m not much of a match for most people.

    John Howard Yoder once said something to the tune of, I say I am a pacifist but that has yet to be tested. That is where I am. I have no clue what would happen if I had to defend my self or my family. Neither does a large majority of people in this country. It’s really a question that can’t be answered. I would really suggest that book it is one of my favorites. If you can’t get a hold of it e-mail me your address. I’ll send one out to you.


  2. wow, great response, thanks!

    i’m gonna try to find an ebook of it (but the chances of that happening, of course, are slim to none).

    you bring up a lot of interesting and valid points, cous’.

  3. Luke Says:

    I believe St. Thomas Aquinas wrote quite a bit on the matter of capital punishment and when it is justifiable. You might wish to note that Christ did recommend selling your clothing to buy a sword if you did not already have one. Why buy a sword if it is always wrong to use?

  4. Rob Says:

    Luke: you are confusing the lesson of a story with some of the facts that happen to be in the story. He commanded a group of specific disciples to buy 2 small swords. This is very far from an individual commandment to each of us to arm ourselves, and is also very far from a commandment to build armies. Two short swords would get them nowhere, and actually they were short daggers, not even military weapons. The purchasing of the swords was part of fulfilling an OT prophecy about the chopping off of an ear/the Messiah being counted among the lawless (Isaiah 53:12), and also the disciples were being tested. And let us not forget the end and the lesson of the story. Jesus commands his disciples “No more of this!” when they become violent.
    Another lesson of the story is the inefficiency of violence. His followers get caught up in this grand hero narrative of saving their leader and the world (much like your roommate B tries to construct these grand, unrealistic scenarios), only to end up hurting a defenseless slave. Jesus then heals this wrongfully injured man. The lesson is that getting caught up in these grand narratives of just violence or redemptive violence just leads to recklessness and sorrow. It all comes back to Jesus proclamation that not only killing is wrong, “But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment.” Those who harbour anger and violent thoughts against others have already sinned, because buying into these hypotheticals about buying swords (or guns, or tanks, or bombs) to protect inevitably lead to more senseless violence than protection of innocent life. This is especially true today when we can be so easily manipulated into believing we are acting to defend innocent people, when in reality we are the aggressors. In fact, throughout history, every military aggressor believed that they were fighting defensively.


Leave a Reply